This weekend the actress Barbara de Regil revealed through her social networks that she was devastated after the unfortunate loss of Nala, her dog, who died of poisoning.
The interpreter of Rosario Tijeras published a postcard in which she appears with her dog, who came into his life just in August, that apparently the fumigator who went to his house, left poison bags in the garden, even though he told him not to do it.
“Nalita ate poison that the fumigator left irresponsibly Although I asked him not to leave it in the garden because there were little dogs. He, well, yes I left him ”, wrote the actress in her long message.
After its publication, his followers turned to messages of support for Barbara de Regil, however, the actress Gala Montes was highly criticized after telling her that he could buy a new puppy.
Not only that, but he expressed that I shouldn’t blame anyoneWell, she had to take responsibility for her pet and not only dedicate herself to uploading a photograph of her crying, it seemed that she wanted to attract attention.
“Now buy another“, wrote the protagonist of ‘Diseñando tu amor’, to which Barbara replied: “I do not understand your comment. A puppy is not a piece of furniture that you change, just like that. “
It did not stop there, well Gala added that Nala’s death was not the gardener’sWell, the actress should have taken care of her pet.
Immediately the followers of Barbara de Regil they turned to messages of support for her and even They told Gala Montes that she was very insensitive.
Of course Gala Montes did not remain silent and through a message published in her ephemeral stories on Instragam, she maintained that the dogs are not abandoned for a month, referring to the constant trips that Bárbara de Regil makes.
He insisted that his comment was sarcasm, because he does not want irresponsible people to spend it buying animals that they cannot buy, also that the difference was that his dogs died at 16 years, not at six months, and pointed out that they should cancel people who ‘make a circus of everything’.