“Plural and transparent” financing of medical training

Pilar Garrido, president of Facme.

The PSOE flirt with the idea of ​​a exclusively public medical training, a plan that seems “complicated” to Pilar Garrido, president of the Federation of Spanish Scientific Medical Associations (Facme), who emphasizes the need for scientific societies to be the ones that, in any case, define the content of the training of health professionals.

“For Facme the important thing is that the definition of training needs is within scientific societies, which are the ones with both the historical trajectory and the experience in training”, claims Garrido. “We have a clear organizational independence for the development of activities. For us the important thing is not who finances it, but who decides the content on which professionals have to be trained “, adds the oncologist.

“Scientific societies are the ones who define the content, prepared for specialists in our field; and we also do a lot of training aimed at patients or complementary training to the FSE for residents. We also do a lot of multidisciplinary meetings to which we invite specialists from other fields “, claims the president of Facme, highlighting the” vision of the areas for improvement “managed by these companies.

“If public funding goes to scientific societies so that they can continue with their framework of action, it would be an option. But when Facme has made an approximation – which is economically undervalued because we have only taken into account what national societies invest and from Facme-, there is no public entity that financially supports that“, argues Garrido.


“Plural” and “transparent financing of medical training

For the Federation, he stresses, the important thing is that “medical training has plural funding as long as it meets the standards of transparency“.” Does the public health system have or is it going to have sufficient financial resources and is it going to allow them to go to scientific societies and the protagonists of training? “Garrido asks, indicating that if it is not, this form is produced , “It is difficult to think that someone who is not an oncologist knows the needs of Oncology”.

“It is very complex to think that a single agent can have all the funds,” says the president of Facme, who doubts the viability of the PSOE proposal. In other countries, Garrido points out, “there are many interested entities that contribute to medical training”, questioning that “in the future, the system has the funds to guarantee that quality training, according to the standards of the scientific societies and transparency “.


“It is surprising to think that a budget line is added for exclusively public medical training”


In addition, it puts on the table the different “open fronts” in health in economic matters, such as the need to hire more personnel or the high drug price. “In this situation, it is surprising to think that a budget line is added for exclusively public medical training,” he says.


The “squalid” public medical training is not solved without the industry

It coincides with Garrido Thomas Cobo, president of the Collegiate Medical Organization (OMC), who has already expressed his rejection of the PSOE’s plans in statements to this medium. In his opinion, the “squalid” support of the Public Administration for the health system has made it depend “traditionally on the pharmaceutical industry“, which has generated” numerous conflicts of interest. “Now the main thing in all parties, he remarks, is to comply with the code of good practices and that this problem is” less and less “.

In this sense, the group considers necessary a more funding by the public coffers so that continuing medical training is “a reality”, which does not necessarily require dissociation from the private sphere, as suggested by the PSOE. For Cobo, it is not necessary to “celebrate” that the system advances without private financing, but rather that it makes it “appropriate to a good practice”


Exclusively public medical training

For its part, the party is committed to fully public financing to avoid dependence on external funders, for example from the private sector, and thus guarantee “equal opportunities”. For socialists, the health learning constitutes the “touchstone” of the system, for which reason they advocate designing measures that promote access to medicine studies of young people from various socioeconomic backgrounds, as indicated in the framework document that will mark the course of the 40th Congress of the party.

Refering to continuous training, consider that the SNS should be in charge of financing and organizing the different programs and courses, contrary to what is currently happening, thus preventing dependence on external agents and possible conflicts of interest that may arise from dual practice.

Although it may contain statements, data or notes from health institutions or professionals, the information contained in Medical Writing is edited and prepared by journalists. We recommend that the reader be consulted with any health-related question with a healthcare professional.

Source link

About Admin

Check Also

Six easy exercises to strengthen the autonomy of the elderly

If there is a social sector that has been particularly hard hit by the pandemic, ... Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *